JTO
03 Jun 2026

JTO - June 2026

Volume 14 Issue 2

From the Executive Editor

This issue of JTO offers a striking reflection of technological innovation, data-driven evidence, multidisciplinary collaboration and deeply human experiences that have shaped modern practices in trauma and orthopaedics.

A reminder of the immense value of robust systems and high-quality data is provided by Derek Pegg and colleagues, where they discuss the importance of National Joint Registry (NJR) data quality, the persistent inequalities between institutions and the practical pressures faced by hospitals struggling to maintain data compliance. Crucially, I am sure we all recognise the importance of supporting the NJR in driving trustworthy research, implant surveillance and patient outcomes.

The issue’s features covering education start with a historical perspective through a thoughtful review of the AO Foundation by Professor Peter
Giannoudis. It is a reminder that many of the concepts now taken for granted in trauma surgery emerged from visionary collaboration, science, engineering, disciplined documentation and education. It is further explored in the collaborative article from the BOA, BOTA and British Hip Society Schools Outreach Programmes, which addresses one of the most important long-term challenges facing our specialty: widening participation and ensuring that the future workforce reflects the populations we serve. In our international feature, Elizabeth Tissingh covers an initiative to improve fracture care and signposts opportunities to support training in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

 

 

Some of the evolving scientific progress in trauma and orthopaedics is covered in the research themed features in the Subspecialty section. Anurag Sinha and colleagues provide a comprehensive review of osteoporosis management. They highlight progressing concepts from suppressing bone resorption to precisely targeting molecular pathways governing skeletal biology. Fragility fractures triggering integrated intervention from orthopaedics, orthogeriatric and fracture liaison services represents a major shift toward holistic patient care. Rhidian Morgan-Jones and Luke Wainwright focus on systems improvement, examining variation in antibiotic prophylaxis for primary arthroplasty. Their work through the GIRFT programme highlights a familiar tension — balancing individual practice patterns with evidence-based standardisation.

Arif Gul’s deeply personal reflection on being both surgeon and patient following severe spinal trauma reflects his lived experience behind pathways, protocols and rehabilitation targets. Arif’s perspective reminds us that excellent orthopaedic care is not defined solely by technical expertise, but by the ability to guide patients through uncertainty with honesty, empathy and consistency.

As AI tools become increasingly integrated into our practice, the questions raised by Gary Mundy are both urgent and unavoidable. The article advocates for informed caution, strong regulation and continued human oversight. Meg Baker and Joe McKay outline the concept of the ‘surgical athlete’, defining the physiological and psychological demands that practice in trauma and orthopaedics imposes on the individual.

Taken together, the articles in this issue reinforce that orthopaedics remains fundamentally a human profession. Behind every registry entry, imaging algorithm, fracture fixation or rehabilitation, is an individual patient whose quality of life depends upon the decisions we make each day.

Amar Rangan, Vice-President
 

 

Subspecialty Section

References

Osteoporosis and the orthopaedic surgeon

  1. Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. Endocr Rev. 1998;19(1):80–100.
  2. Russell RGG, Xia Z, Dunford JE, et al. Bisphosphonates: an update on mechanisms of action and how these relate to clinical efficacy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1117:209–57.
  3. Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1799–809.
  4. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–42.
  5. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:756–65.
  6. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, et al. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:153–61.
  7. Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020:dgaa756.
  8. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–33.
  9. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women JAMA. 2010;304:1684–92.
  10. Khosla S, Oursler MJ, Monroe DG. Estrogen and the skeleton. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23:576–81.
  11. Reginster JY, Seeman E, De Vernejoul MC, et al. Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2816–22.
  12. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434–41.
  13. Vahle JL, Long GG, Sandusky G, et al. Bone neoplasms in F344 rats given teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] are dependent on duration of treatment and dose. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30:312–21.
  14. Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, et al. Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316:722–33.
  15. Leder BZ, O'Dea LS, Zanchetta JR, et al. Effects of abaloparatide, a human parathyroid hormone-related peptide analog, on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):697–706.
  16. Cosman F, Hattersley G, Hu MY, et al. Effects of Abaloparatide-SC on Fractures and Bone Mineral Density in Subgroups of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis and Varying Baseline Risk Factors. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(1):17-23.
  17. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1532–43.
  18. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1417–27.
  19. Wilkinson JM, Eagleton AC, Stockley I, et al. Effect of pamidronate on bone turnover and implant migration after total hip arthroplasty: A randomized trial. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1-8.
  20. Aspenberg P, Genant HK, Johansson T, et al. Teriparatide for acceleration of fracture repair in humans: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 102 postmenopausal women with distal radial fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(2):404-14
  21. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:2359–81.
  22. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):412-20.
  23. van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517-22.

When AI gets it wrong: Medico-legal accountability in orthopaedics

  1. Zheng Z, Ryu BY, Kim SE, Song DS, Kim SH, Park JW, Ro DH. Deep learning for automated hip fracture detection and classification : achieving superior accuracy. Bone Joint J. 2025;107-B(2):213-20.
  2. Karnuta JM, Murphy MP, Luu BC, Ryan MJ, Haeberle HS, Brown NM, et al. Artificial Intelligence for Automated Implant Identification in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter External Validation Study Exceeding Two Million Plain Radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1998-2003.e1.
  3. Karlin EA, Lin CC, Meftah M, Slover JD, Schwarzkopf R. The Impact of Machine Learning on Total Joint Arthroplasty Patient Outcomes: A Systemic Review. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):2085-95. 
  4. Shen X, Luo J, Tang X, Chen B, Qin Y, Zhou Y, Xiao J. Deep Learning Approach for Diagnosing Early Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):2044-50
  5. Salzmann M, Hassan Tarek H, Prill R, Becker R, Schreyer AG, Hable R, et al. Artificial intelligence-based assessment of leg axis parameters shows excellent agreement with human raters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jan;33(1):177-90.
  6. Wyles CC, Fu S, Odum SL, Rowe T, Habet NA, Berry DJ, et al. External Validation of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Extract Common Data Elements in THA Operative Notes. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):2081-4.
  7. Robotic-assisted Surgery. A pathway to the future. Royal College of Surgeons of England. December 2025.
  8. AI Clinical Use Guide. Guidance for clinicians. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health care 2025.
  9. Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
  10. Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021.
  11. UK Medical Devices Regulations 2002.
  12. European Union. Artificial Intelligence Act, 2024.
  13. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. AI Regulation White Paper, 2023.
  14. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. Initial guidance on implementing the UK AI regulatory principles, 2024.
  15. Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill (HL) Private members bill 4th March 2025
  16. UK Jurisdiction Taskforce. Consultation on liability for AI-related harm, 2024.
  17. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.
  18. UK General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018.
  19. Equality Act 2010.
  20. Implementation of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in England. GIRFT. July 2025

Improving fracture care in the Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany EC, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2016;22(1):3-18. 
  1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22.
  1. World Health Organisation 2022 Factsheet. Available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions#:~:text=Approximately%201.71%20billion%20people%20have,of%20disability%20in%20160%20countries.  
  1. Liu S, Wang B, Fan S, Wang Y, Zhan Y, Ye D. Global burden of musculoskeletal disorders and attributable factors in 204 countries and territories: a secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e062183.
  1. Tissingh EK, Marais L, Loro A, Bose D, Paner NT, Ferguson J, Morgensten M, McNally M. Management of fracture-related infection in low resource settings: how applicable are the current consensus guidelines? EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(6):422-32.
  1. Petitfour L, Bonnet E, Mathevet I, Nikiema A, Ridde V. Out-of-pocket payments and catastrophic expenditures due to traffic injuries in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11(1):46.
  1. World Bank 2023 The Disability Burden of Road Traffic Injuries. Available at: www.roadsafetyfacility.org.
  1. World Health Organisation The Global Health Observatory Data 2000-2019. Available at: www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/global-health-estimates-leading-causes-of-dalys.
  1. Challenges and Opportunities: Surgical care in Kongo Central, DRC. Available at: www.kcl.ac.uk/kghp/assets/surgical-care-in-kongo-central-english.pdf.
  1. Good healthcare data improves the quality of care: the DRC experience. Available at: www.kcl.ac.uk/good-healthcare-data-improves-the-quality-of-care-the-drc-experience.
  1. Safe Surgery Saves Lives EKFS. Available at: www.ekfs.de/en/humanitarian-funding/currently-funded-projects/Developing-Safe-Surgery-Practice-in-Kongo.

Operating at your best: Shaping the surgical athlete and the person behind the skill

  1. Norton J, ,  E, Boyle C, Yule S, Tambyraja A. Utilizing a surgical sabermetrics framework to evaluate the impact of simulated operative crises on trainee cognitive load and non-technical skills. J Surg Protoc Res Methodol. 2024;2024(4):snae016. 
  2. Zhao J, Fox S, Hutson R, et al. Reducing cognitive load through early exposure: the role of video-based learning in microsurgical training—a pilot randomized two-group educational efficacy study. BMC Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026;2:11.
  3. Yule S, Janda A, Likosky DS. Surgical Sabermetrics: Applying Athletics Data Science to Enhance Operative Performance. Ann Surg Open. 2021;2(2):e054.
  4. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R. The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):318-30, 330.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Dec 14. PMID: 20004924. 
  5. Kegelaers J. Are we really studying resilience in sport? A critical review of adopted methodologies. Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1270887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270887. PMID: 37954183; PMCID: PMC10637379. 
  6. Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003 Jun;133(6):614-21. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.169. PMID: 12796727. 
  7. Philibert I. Sleep loss and performance in residents and nonphysicians: a meta-analytic examination. Sleep. 2005 Nov;28(11):1392-402. doi: 10.1093/sleep/28.11.1392. PMID: 16335329. 
  8. Lockley SW, et al, Harvard Work Hours, Health and Safety Group. Effects of health care provider work hours and sleep deprivation on safety and performance. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Nov;33(11 Suppl):7-18. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33109-7. PMID: 18173162. 
  9. Taffinder NJ, et al. Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons' dexterity on laparoscopy simulator. Lancet. 1998 Oct 10;352(9135):1191. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)00034-8. PMID: 9777838.
  10. Como CJ, et al. The Surgeon Athlete? Analysis of the Nutritional Habits of Orthopaedic Surgery Residents. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Apr 18;9(4):e24.00316. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00316. PMID: 40257828; PMCID: PMC12014026. 
  11. Muscaritolio M, The Impact of Nutrients on Mental Health and Well-Being: Insights From the Literature, Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021 Mar 8;8:656290. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.656290 PMID 33763446 
  12. Balendran B, Bath MF, Awopetu AI, Kreckler SM. Burnout within UK surgical specialties: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl [Internet]. 2021 Jul [cited 2026 Apr 21];103(7):464–470. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.7058 
  13. Salles A, Cohen GL, Mueller CM. The relationship between grit and resident well-being. Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):251-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 23. PMID: 24238604. 
  14. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1103-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1103. PMID: 16954490. 
Return to Knowledge Hub